Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by KOKUYO

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KOKUYO (talk · contribs)[edit]

All photos taken from a single external website, author name and uploader name are not similar, possible COM:COPYVIO.

114.26.147.35 07:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 15:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Restored per https://musou.tw/statement Alan (talk) 20:56, 26 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KOKUYO (talk · contribs)[edit]

Derivative work of © files. IMHO not valid de minimis

Alan (talk) 22:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Some photos apply Commons:De minimis and Template:PD-textlogo, like File:潘建志 (4).JPG, File:潘建志 (7).JPG.--KOKUYO (talk) 14:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In my humble opinion, I think File:柯建銘 (4).JPG is very similar to File:Museu_Valencià_de_la_Il·lustració_i_la_Modernitat,_interior.jpg. While in the mean time, the work of File:潘建志 (8).JPG is also incidental work. One of the UK's law clearly stated: Copyright in a work is not infringed by its incidental inclusion in an artistic work. --Shangkuanlc (talk) 11:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Deleted, photo 4 is kept, because map is not seen in full and text is not readable. The others are deleted, for example, there is no freedom of panorama in Taiwan and text in photo 7 is enough long for copyright. There is no incidental inclusion in file 8. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KOKUYO (talk · contribs)[edit]

Photos about PLA Navy from flickr user Simon YANG's , many found in google Image search. These photos maybe copyvio.

PS: if these Photos copyvio, plese add Simon YANG to flickr blacklist

shizhao (talk) 08:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In the Google Image search can be found earlier than the flickr upload time the same picture --shizhao (talk) 08:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KOKUYO (talk · contribs)[edit]

These images are possibly not covered by eldiario.es licensing conditions. Main issue is that the images are not the ones actually published in the URL provided as source. They're higher resolution images that does not come from the allegued source and therefore cannot be covered by the license (it is possible to release a lower resolution image under a CC license while assigning a more restrictive license to higher quality images). Secondly, many of the images contain a clear copyright notice in the EXIF information, thus stating that such a specific version is copyrighted (see this or this). Finally, even the actually published versions keep a copyright notice, possibly invalidating the eldiario.es licensing conditions (see this or this). IMHO, the copyright status of these images is dubious

Only Tag "SANDRA LÁZARO" (example):

Tag "©SANDRA LÁZARO" (example):

Discasto talk 20:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

非常有趣的觀點,但是這分成兩部分:

  1. 這些照片當然都是從eldiario.es上來的,和美國之音相同,eldiario.es是從圖片網址細部修改來決定檔案大小和裁切方式,例如這篇新聞的照片,可以有原網站裁切最大圖片最小圖片。如果以File:Cargas-Sardenya-Diputacio-Ramon-Llull EDIIMA20171001 0193 19.jpg來說,亦能取得較小的原始圖片的檔案,所以你的第一個理由並不存在。
  2. 而關於網站使用©SANDRA LÁZARO和SANDRA LÁZARO兩種標記方式,網站並沒有說明原因,但似乎是要跟EXIF是否標記作者脫鉤,參見這篇網頁與其原始圖片

因此要有更詳細的確認方式,應該去詢問eldiario.es。 --KOKUYO (talk) 20:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Interesting point of view but the licensing conditions apply to "published contents". We can argue a lot about what "publication" means, but it's simpler and safer to consider the obvious meaning: something that is published as part of a piece of news on the web. Not something with a non public URL you have to guess and build (and you deliverately omit, thus forging the source you provide). --Discasto talk 21:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It is like VOA, VOA even could change URL to add logo:
website: https://www.voachinese.com/a/KMT-COMMENORATES-72ND-ANNIVERSARY-OF-WWll/4085286.html
website image URL: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w1023_r1_s.jpg
no logo image URL: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w1023_r1.jpg
full image URL: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA.jpg
other image size 123: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w123_r1.jpg
other image size 456: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w456_r1.jpg
other image size 789: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w789_r1.jpg
--KOKUYO (talk) 21:29, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And in this page (http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/), I think it means all website content/contenido (. except content from EFE...., or comic) use CC-BY-SA. This page use "contenido", no "published content".--KOKUYO (talk) 21:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
事情分成三個部分,而 User:Discasto卻把這些弄混在一起:
  1. 只標記"SANDRA LÁZARO"的照片,應該如同Robert BonetRobert Bonet)等人,視為專屬的攝影師
  2. 標記有"©SANDRA LÁZARO"的照片,CC BY-SA似乎與©標記作者沒有衝突,應參考Commons:Credit line
  3. User:Discasto主張只能使用網頁提供的縮小圖片,忽視eldiario.es的CC BY-SA授權是指網站內容、而非只有發布內容,原始圖片同樣屬於網站內容。
--KOKUYO (talk) 23:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep As I understand it, all material on the website eldiario.es is covered by the license. This includes the above images. Lymantria (talk) 14:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep Normally I pass higher resolution images too as long as the author is correctly attributed. In a few OTRS cases, a flickr author does specify the use of a certain image resolution only but I don't know if eldiario.es says this in their permission statement. This eldisario permission statement does not mention image resolution unless Jcb, Jameslwoodward or Yann knows the answer. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The only exceptions are third party material (attributed as such at their website) and comics (available with NC restriction). And they state that their license, CC-BY-SA, is the most open CC license of all, which is not true of course, CC-BY is more open. Anyway, CC-BY-SA is fine for us. Jcb (talk) 22:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: a CC license is for a picture, not for one specific resolution of that picture. Also in their own licensing information, there is no indication that eldiario.es wants to restrict the resolution available under the CC-BY-SA license. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KOKUYO (talk · contribs)[edit]

Commons:Derivative work from modern art/photos/books/TV. Some may be blanked to keep.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:39, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:40, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]