User talk:Jarekt

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Need your input on a policy impacting gadgets and UserJS[edit]

Dear interface administrator,

This is Samuel from the Security team and I hope my message finds you well.

There is an ongoing discussion on a proposed policy governing the use of external resources in gadgets and UserJS. The proposed Third-party resources policy aims at making the UserJS and Gadgets landscape a bit safer by encouraging best practices around external resources. After an initial non-public conversation with a small number of interface admins and staff, we've launched a much larger, public consultation to get a wider pool of feedback for improving the policy proposal. Based on the ideas received so far, the proposed policy now includes some of the risks related to user scripts and gadgets loading third-party resources, best practices for gadgets and UserJS developers, and exemptions requirements such as code transparency and inspectability.

As an interface administrator, your feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome until July 17, 2023 on the policy talk page.

Have a great day!

Samuel (WMF), on behalf of the Foundation's Security team 23:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-28[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Crack climbing in Indian Creek, Utah.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crack climbing in Indian Creek, Utah.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-29[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What's going on here?[edit]

This seems like a really weird edit, and with no summary. Is it intentional? If I saw this from a less experienced user, I would have assumed vandalism & reverted it. - Jmabel ! talk 23:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Actually, looking again: it has to be wrong, because not only did you revive a bunch of old discussions, you also killed all the current ones. I'll revert, then you can do again whatever you meant to do. - Jmabel ! talk 23:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is it okay to start using {{License from structured data}} on a large number of pages? I incorporated it into {{DPLA metadata}}—which is able to display all DPLA fields except for two now—and I'd like to start doing replacements soon like this one. I have my template working for all cases in the DPLA files, but I didn't want to start applying it widely without checking with you first. Dominic (talk) 01:35, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]